The idea of an oath for scientists has gained strength in recent years as the pace of science has threatened to outstrip the speed at which its ethical implications are assimilated. But the idea is not a new one. Motivated by their horror at the role of science in the Second World War, Albert Einstein and John Kendrew championed the notion in the middle of the last century. But many fear that such vows enshrine a conformity that is incompatible with the creative freedom central to scientific discovery.
Medical doctors vow not to abuse the power that they have over sick people – an oath inspired by the 2,500-year-old Hippocratic formula, which has certainly been in the back of the minds of those involved in the discussion of euthanasia. In veterinary medicine, some teaching institutions have also formulated their moral obligations. This is the “Veteriarian’s Oath” adopted by the American Veterinary Medical Association in 1969:
“Being admitted to the profession of veterinary medicine, I solemnly swear to use my scientific knowledge and skills for the benefit of society through the protection of animal health, the relief on animal suffering, the conservation of livestock, resources, the promotion of public health, and the advancement of medical knowledge. I will practice my profession conscientiously, with integrity, and in keeping with the principles of veterinary ethics. I accept as a lifelong obligation the continual improvement of my professional knowledge and competence”.
