![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() |
The FCoV carrier state Fig. 5 The difference between recurrent and
persistent infections. Viruses may be maintained in a population either
by animal-to-animal transfer or by prolonged presence in an individual's
body. As we learn more about viruses, the persistent infection appears
to be the rule rather than the exception - and it occurs also in feline
coronaviruses.
Recently, a modification of the conventional RT-PCR procedure was introduced - the so-called TaqMan technique. It allows testing of many samples within a short period of time, and in addition permits the reliable quantitation of FCoV genomes in a sample, e.g. in rectal swabs taken from individual cats [7] (for details of the TaqMan technique, look into the Tools section of this VetSciTe issue). Using this technique, the coronavirus shedding pattern was determined over a period of 24 weeks in 77 cats kept in multi-cat household situations. We found a highly significant correlation between the amount of FCoV shed in feaces and the frequency of shedding [13]
Fig. 6 Correlation between shedding frequency
and shedding intensity in 77 cats followed for 24 weeks. It becomes
clear that with higher shedding frequency the amount shed is significantly
increased (r=0.9895, p<0.0001). The amount of FcoV shed in 1 g
faeces with a Ct value of 30 equals 10 exp.7 viral particles.
The shedding frequency in these cats was found to be low (<30%
of all samples positive) in 78%, intermediate (between 30% and 90%
of all samples positive) in 21% and high (>90% of all samples positive)
in 1% of the cats. ![]()
Fig.7 Unrooted 'phylogenetic trees' showing genetic relationships between feline coronaviruses, where branch length indicates evolutionary distance. Graph A illustrates the relationship between coronaviruses shed by cats in a closed breeding facility in Hanover, Germany (isolates indicated by H) as compared with laboratory strains; field strains from the Netherlands (C, Dahlberg) and the United States (RM) are included. The non-structural gene 7b was used in this comparison. Panel B shows a more detailed analysis - of the structural S gene - with in the Hanover cattery alone. Clusters of more closely related viruses can be distinguished, most of them from littermates. Amino acid substitutions were not random but are linked to predicted epitopes, indicating antigenic drift. At the 1997 WSAVA/BSAVA Congress in Birmingham, workers from Bristol
University first presented data that confirmed this epidemiologic concept
using a different approach. These workers were indeed able to culture
FCoVs from the blood of healthy cats from seropositive catteries. Blood
samples obtained from healthy cats of nine different breeds from nine
separate catteries were examined, and growth of FCoV, demonstrable by
PCR, was obtained in most cases, some of which were FCoV antibody-negative.
The conclusion reached was again: most healthy cats living in catteries
with a past history of FIP are persistently infected with FcoVs [6].
The important finding of this biologically meaningful analysis was that
the isolated viruses were of the 'non-cultivable' subtype I. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||