 |




|
 |
 |

you are here > home
> reviews > visions on the
future... > introduction
Visions on the future of veterinary virology
Mathias Ackermann
Introduction
One of the most common perceptions of a virus is to look at it as an
enemy, a pathogen, a "disease-causing germ". In veterinary virology,
this usually translates into "XY virus causes a devastating (severe,
economically important) disease in this or that animal species and may
(even) be transmitted to man". Indeed, many viruses have been recognized
as the causative agents of diseases, such as Rinderpest, Foot-and-Mouth
Disease, Malignant Catarrhal Fever, African and Classical Swine Fever,
Pseudorabies, Transmisssible Gastroenteritis, Canine Distemper, Feline
Parvovirosis, Rabies, and Influenza - to name but a few. On the other
hand, viruses with little or no known pathogenicity did not stir much
interest, were neglected at best, if not ridiculed in the scientific
community. Examples include bovine herpesvirus type 4, canine parvovirus
1, porcine circovirus, toroviruses, and lentiviruses in general, at
least before the advent of the AIDS epidemic.
Indeed, research was focused mainly on the disease-causing viruses.
Adaptation of viruses to grow in cell culture and the increasing knowledge
of molecular biology have contributed most to the expanding field of
virology in the second half of the 20th century.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the number of appearances of the keyword "virus"
in Medline from 1960 to 1999 reveals two stepwise increases, the first
one in the mid-sixties reflecting the progress made in molecular biology
or, more specifically, in genetic engineering. The second step in the
mid-seventies coincides with the Asilomar conference, where scientists
declared their willingness to carry the responsibility for their work,
particularly in the field of genetic engineering. With the advent of
the AIDS epidemic, an exponential increase of virus-related literature
can be observed, which levelled into a plateau by the mid-nineties.
In 1999 the keyword "virus" was found 11.686 times, not even reaching
the number of quotes in 1994 (11.788 times). Is this statistic heralding
the doom of virology?

Fig. 1 Frequencies at which the keyword "virus"
appeared in Medline (between 1966 and April 2000).
Read more...

home
| editorial | news
| reviews | education
| tools | policies
| archives | about
vst
|
 |
 |